The Bid & Ask

Quotations, Dispatches, and the Daily Tape

Thursday, August 13, 2026

Rejected thesis

Dormancy window sweep (60 / 120 / 180 / 252 days)

The result

Follow-up to the dormant-awakening entry above: does extending the dormancy precondition beyond 3 months (60d) — to 6mo / 9mo / 1yr — produce a stronger signal? Intuition would say yes: more time quiet = more pent-up energy.

Code: research/dormant_awakening.py --window {120,180,252} Reports: research/dormant_awakening_{120,180,252}d_report.json

Sample-size collapse:

Window Base events T+1 confirms
60d 2,309 216
120d 434 28
180d 104 7
252d 15 1

True 252-day dormancy at the $5M ADV / $5 price gate is extremely rare in the cached US universe — only 15 events in 15 years.

Edge degrades monotonically as dormancy lengthens:

Window n 5d edge 20d edge 40d edge 60d edge hit@20d
60d 2309 +0.33 % +0.74 % +0.63 % +0.79 % 0.56
120d 434 +0.30 % +0.59 % +0.47 % +0.92 % 0.56
180d 104 +0.02 % +0.01 % -0.25 % -0.43 % 0.55
252d 15 -1.53 % -5.81 % -6.30 % -6.29 % 0.40

The 252-day cell is too small (n=15) to lean on individually, but the monotone trend across 60 → 120 → 180 → 252 is hard to miss. The intuition was wrong: longer-required dormancy doesn't compress more spring; it filters into a population with structural reasons to be dormant (small float, distress, no analyst coverage, dying franchise) where the wake-up is more often a one-off catalyst that fades than the start of continuation.

T+1 confirmation pattern survives at every window:

Window n 20d edge hit@20d
60d 216 +5.97 % 0.79
120d 28 +5.57 % 0.79
180d 7 +3.44 % 0.86
252d 1 +1.84 % 1.00

The day-2-confirmation sub-cohort lifts the edge to ~+5-6 %/20d at hit-rate 0.79+ everywhere it has meaningful n. So the confirmation pattern is window-independent, while the dormancy precondition is mildly destructive at length.

Verdict: Keep dormancy short (60d at most) or drop the dormancy precondition altogether. The burst_continuation cohort already captures the cleaner version of "first-day spike + day-2 confirm" without any dormancy filter (n=720, edge +9 %/20d, hit 0.70). The dormancy-conditioned variant adds noise rather than signal as the window lengthens.

Meta-finding extended: Across burst_continuation, dormant_awakening at 60/120/180/252d, and failed_breakdown, the day-2 follow-through is the only selector that produces a clean +5-9 %/20d positive forward drift. Prior-day conditioning (dormancy, prior crash, prior thrust) modulates which population fires the trigger but does not itself create the alpha. The pattern is: the second day tells you whether the first day was real.

At a glance
Sample15
Validatorresearch/dormant_awakening.py --window {120,180,252}
VerdictRejected

Every result here is reproducible from the script named above. Reports are in the repository.

Other rejected theses